When Should Legacy Applications in.NET 10 Refactor or Rewrite?
Many companies are assessing whether their current.NET Framework or older.NET Core applications should switch to.NET 10 as they move toward quicker release cycles, more robust security, and contemporary cloud-native designs. This raises the most challenging dilemma in any modernization project: Should you start from scratch or refactor your existing application?
To assist teams in weighing both options, this essay deconstructs a straightforward, useful decision-making process. To help you make your final decision, you’ll also examine typical situations, migration tactics, and real-world instances.
1. Understanding What .NET 10 Brings to Legacy Applications
Before choosing a path, it helps to understand what .NET 10 offers:
- Unified development model across web, cloud, desktop, mobile, and AI workloads
- Improved performance (runtime, GC, JIT, networking)
- Long-term security improvements
- Modern C# features that simplify long-term maintenance
- Stronger cloud-native support through containers, minimal APIs, modern hosting, and observability
- Better tooling for DevOps, testing, diagnostics, and debugging
The decision ultimately depends on how well your legacy codebase can adapt to these capabilities.
2. When Refactoring Is the Better Option
Refactoring is ideal when the existing system is stable, valuable, and structurally sound — even if it’s outdated.
2.1 Scenarios Where Refactoring Works Well
a) The core business logic is still valid
If your domain rules remain accurate and stable, refactoring helps preserve those investments.
b) The architecture is old but not broken
Layered applications, monoliths, and N-tier services often move cleanly into .NET 10 with staged updates.
c) You need faster delivery with reduced risk
Refactoring allows incremental modernization with fewer unknowns.
d) The team understands the codebase
When institutional knowledge exists, refactoring is far cheaper and faster than replacing everything.
e) You want to avoid multi-year rewrites
Refactors can be done module by module without halting product delivery.
2.2 Advantages of Refactoring
- Lower cost and lower risk compared to rewriting
- Allows progressive modernization in controlled steps
- Maintains business continuity
- Reuses validated logic and workflows
- Enables parallel upgrades (platform, libraries, architecture)
2.3 Common Refactoring Approaches
a) Migrate to .NET 10 using the “lift-and-shift” approach
Move the project to .NET 10 with minimal code changes, then optimize later.
b) Incremental modular modernization
Break monoliths into domains or services over time, starting with isolated components.
c) Replace outdated dependencies step-by-step
E.g., move from WebForms to Razor Pages or move legacy WCF logic to gRPC or minimal APIs.
d) Adopt modern patterns gradually
Introduce dependency injection, logging, configuration abstractions, and async code without rewriting the core.
2.4 Real Example
A financial services company has a large, stable risk-calculation engine running on .NET Framework 4.7. Their logic is deeply tested and approved by regulators. A rewrite would require recertification, taking years.
Refactoring is chosen to move to .NET 10 while keeping algorithms intact. The team gradually replaces UI modules and updates the hosting model.
3. When Rewriting Is the Better Option
Rewriting is ideal when legacy systems are too rigid, outdated, or problematic to salvage.
3.1 Scenarios Where Rewriting Makes Sense
a) The legacy architecture limits future growth
If the application uses WebForms, heavy WCF, or tightly coupled modules, refactoring may only delay inevitable problems.
b) Performance or scalability issues are structural
Some issues cannot be fixed without fundamental rewrites — for example, blocking synchronous pipelines, massive shared state, or legacy ORM issues.
c) Large sections of code are untestable
If code has no tests, unclear ownership, or mixed concerns, rewriting can restore long-term maintainability.
d) Major feature changes are being planned
If you’re already introducing new workflows or redesigning the experience, rewriting may be more efficient.
e) Technical debt is too high or dependencies are obsolete
Apps relying on unsupported libraries, legacy UI frameworks, or outdated security models are often better rebuilt.
3.2 Advantages of Rewriting
- Clean, modern architecture from the ground up
- Ability to adopt new service patterns, cloud capabilities, and hosting models
- Opportunity to redesign the user experience
- Eliminates years of accumulated technical debt
- Easier long-term maintenance and extensibility
3.3 Common Rewrite Approaches
a) Full greenfield rebuild
Create a new solution in .NET 10 and migrate feature sets over time.
b) Strangler-fig pattern
Build new services or modules next to the old system, gradually routing traffic to the new implementation until the legacy system is retired.
c) Domain-first rewrite
Rebuild each domain independently, following domain-driven boundaries.
d) UI-first or API-first rebuilds
Start from the surface layer and work inward — common for legacy UI frameworks.
3.4 Real Example
A retail company runs a legacy WebForms application with tightly coupled SQL logic, minimal test coverage, and slow performance during peak traffic. Development is painful and deploying new features causes outages.
Rewriting is chosen using the strangler-fig pattern. The team builds minimal APIs and modern front-end components while gradually offloading features from the legacy system.
4. How to Decide: A Practical Decision Framework
Decision Question 1: Is the domain logic still correct and valuable?
- Yes → Lean toward refactoring
- No → Rewrite
Decision Question 2: Is the architecture modular enough to support modernization?
- Yes → Refactor
- No → Rewrite or strangler-fig
Decision Question 3: What is the risk tolerance?
- Low risk, continuous delivery required → Refactor
- Higher risk acceptable, large budget → Rewrite
Decision Question 4: How fast must teams deliver new features?
- Soon → Refactor
- Major redesign planned → Rewrite
Decision Question 5: How much technical debt exists?
- Moderate → Refactor
- Extreme → Rewrite
Decision Question 6: Are dependencies still supported?
- Mostly supported → Refactor
- End-of-life technologies → Rewrite
This framework helps teams align business priorities with technical realities.
5. Migration Strategy: Step-by-Step Path for Each Option
5.1 Strategy for Refactoring to .NET 10
- Audit the existing solution (dependencies, architecture, code quality)
- Update project files and toolchains
- Fix API incompatibilities and replace deprecated libraries
- Enable modern hosting and DI patterns
- Introduce integration tests and automated pipelines
- Optimize performance after migration
- Modernize architecture incrementally (modules, services, async, configurations)
5.2 Strategy for Rewriting into .NET 10
- Define the future architecture (clean architecture, microservices, modular monolith)
- Identify domains and boundaries
- Choose a migration sequence (UI-first, API-first, domain-first)
- Build the new system in parallel
- Use the strangler-fig pattern for transition
- Gradually shift traffic to new components
- Decommission the legacy system carefully
6. Real-World Comparison Table
| Requirement | Refactor | Rewrite |
|---|---|---|
| Time to deliver | Faster | Slower |
| Cost | Lower | Higher |
| Technical debt removal | Partial | Complete |
| Feature redesign | Limited | Full freedom |
| Modern architecture | Gradual | Immediate |
| Business continuity | Very strong | Requires planning |
| Risk level | Low | Medium–High |
Summary
Migrating legacy applications to .NET 10 is a significant step toward modern performance, maintainability, and cloud readiness. The core decision — refactor or rewrite — depends on your system’s architecture, business logic value, technical debt, risk tolerance, and future roadmap.
Refactoring is ideal when the existing application is stable and still aligned with business needs. Rewriting is the better choice when the legacy foundation cannot support future growth, major redesigns are required, or existing code is too brittle to salvage.
By using a structured decision framework and selecting the right strategy, organizations can modernize with confidence and deliver long-term value from their .NET 10 adoption.
ASP.NET Core 10.0 Hosting Recommendation
HostForLIFE.eu
HostForLIFE.eu is a popular recommendation that offers various hosting choices. Starting from shared hosting to dedicated servers, you will find options fit for beginners and popular websites. It offers various hosting choices if you want to scale up. Also, you get flexible billing plans where you can choose to purchase a subscription even for one or six months.